The European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the Use of New Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation - A Brief Summary

Login or register to view PDF.
Abstract

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) has produced a practical guide to detail the use of NOACs in clinical practice. The guide includes a practical start-up and follow-up scheme, emphasising the importance of strict adherence to the regimen - the anticoagulant effect drops rapidly after 12-24 hours. There is also guidance on how to measure the anticoagulant effect of NOACs, switching between anticoagulant regimes and dealing with dosing errors. Physicians will have to consider the pharmacokinetic effect of drugs and co-morbidities when prescribing NOACs - plasma levels of NOACs may be affected by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrates, as well as cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) inducers or inhibitors. In patients with chronic kidney disease, reduced doses of NOACs may be indicated. Guidance is also given on the management of bleeding complications, and the cessation and reinitiation of NOACs in patients undergoing surgical interventions. Finally, the use of NOACs in specific clinical situations is considered; these include patients with AF and coronary artery disease (CAD), patients presenting with acute stroke while taking NOACs and patients with cancer.

Support
Paulus Kirchhof was a co-author of the European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Received date
17 October 2013
Accepted date
25 October 2013
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.15420/aer.2013.2.2.115

New oral anticoagulants (NOACs), including dabigatran1 (a direct thrombin inhibitor), apixaban,2 rivaroxaban3 and edoxaban4 (activated factor Xa inhibitors, not yet approved) have become alternatives to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for thromboembolic prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), as a result of their numerous clinical advantages. However, there is a need for a practical guide detailing their use in specific clinical situations, which cannot be provided by practice guidelines due to lack of evidence and supporting data.5 For similar reasons, the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) supplied by the manufacturer cannot provide such information. Furthermore, SmPCs are written for each individual agent, while the NOACs can often be treated as a group in practical terms. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) has therefore produced a practical guide to help with the use of the NOACs in clinical practice until more 'real life' data are available.6 This article aims to provide a brief summary of this guide.

Practical Start-up and Follow-up Scheme for Patients on New Oral Anticoagulants
Before prescribing NOACs to patients with AF, a risk-benefit analysis should be carried out. When choosing a NOAC, the possibility of drug- drug interactions (DDIs) with co-medications should be considered. At the time of prescribing NOACS, patient education is crucial. The concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is also recommended to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients should carry details about their therapy; a generic information card could serve for all NOACs. Most importantly, at start-up, it is vital to educate the patient on the importance of strict adherence to regimen, stressing the dangers of discontinuation or missing a dose.

A structured follow-up procedure for patients taking NOACs is essential, preferably every three months. Follow-ups can be undertaken by general practitioners (GPs), appropriate secondary care physicians, or nurse co-ordinated AF clinics.7 During each visit, the following should be checked:

  • compliance, including inspecting remaining medication;
  • signals of thromboembolism;
  • adverse effects (AEs), particularly bleeding; and
  • use of co-medications.

Monitoring haemoglobin, renal and hepatic function should be performed yearly; more frequently in patients receiving dabigatran, in elderly and/or frail patients and those with compromised renal function.5

How to Measure the Anticoagulant Effect of New Oral Anticoagulants
Routine monitoring of coagulation is not required, although quantitative assessment of drug exposure may be useful in some emergency situations. In the absence of good data, a history of drug intake is probably the best available information on the anticoagulant effect.

When interpreting anticoagulation assays, it is important to know exactly when the NOAC was administered relative to the time of blood sampling. The maximum effect on clotting tests is gained around three hours after administration. For dabigatran, thrombin time (TT), ecarin clotting time (ECT),8,9 activated thromboplastin time (aPTT)8,9 and prothrombin test (PT)9,10 may be used. Anti-factor Xa chromogenic assays are also commercially available; though their use has not been comprehensively validated.

Drug-Drug Interactions and Pharmacokinetics of New Oral Anticoagulants
The uptake, metabolism and elimination of NOACs are summarised in Table 1. Mechanisms underlying potential DDIs include the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter involved in absorption and renal clearance.11 Plasma levels of NOACs may be affected by P-gp substrates, which include many drugs used in AF patients (e.g. verapamil, dronedarone, quinidine). Cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) is involved in the hepatic clearance of rivaroxaban,12 but dabigatran is unaffected.13 Plasma levels of rivaroxaban may therefore be affected by CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors.

Dose reduction of NOACs is essential in patients treated with concomitant medications that increase the NOAC plasma level.14,15 Therefore a system of levels of alert has been devised whereby red indicates a contraindication for use, orange indicates adaptation of the NOAC dose and yellow indicates dose maintenance, unless there are two concomitant yellow interactions, in which case dose reduction is recommended. A detailed table of potential DDIs is presented in Table 2.

 

Absorption and Metabolism of New Oral Anticoagulants
 

Potential Drug-Drug Interactions - Effects on New Oral Anticoagulant Plasma Levels
 

Switching Between Anticoagulant Regimens
When switching between anticoagulant regimes, anticoagulant efficacy must be maintained while minimising bleeding risk. Switching from VKAs to NOAC can be immediate if the international normalized ratio (INR) is less than 2.0. Due to the slow onset of action of VKAs, when switching from NOACs to VKAs, the two drugs should be administered concomitantly until the INR reaches an appropriate level.

Ensuring Compliance with New Oral Anticoagulant Intake
Ensuring compliance with NOAC intake is vital because the anticoagulant effect drops rapidly after 12-24 hours. Daily dosing (QD) has been associated with better compliance than twice daily dosing (BID) in other drugs,16 but there is insufficient data to instruct an optimum regime. Patient education may involve leaflets and instruction at initiation, patient safety cards and group sessions. Technological aids such as medication boxes may help. If low compliance persists, a therapy switch to VKAs may be appropriate.

Management of Bleeding in Patients Taking New Oral Anticoagulants
 

How to Deal with Dosing Errors
Dosing errors must be dealt with promptly. In case of a missed dose on a BID regime, the missed dose can be taken up to six hours after the scheduled intake. If this is not possible, the dose should be skipped and the next scheduled dose taken. For QD, the missed dose can be taken up to 12 hours after scheduled intake. After a double dose, on BID, skip the next planned dose and restart BID after 24 hours. On QD, continue the normal regimen. Hospitalisation is advised in case of overdose.

Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) confers the risk of thromboembolic events and bleeding in AF patients,17,18 as well as being a risk factor for stroke and systemic embolism.19 NOACs may be used in AF patients with mild or moderate CKD. Careful consideration should be given before administering dabigatran, which is primarily cleared renally, to patients with CKD. Individual risk-benefit analyses should be undertaken. Reduced doses of FXa inhibitors may be indicated in patients with reduced renal function (creatinine clearance [CrCl] 30-50 ml/min).10 Dose reductions are indicated in patients with CrCl <50 ml/min for apixaban2 and rivaroxaban.20 NOACs should be avoided in AF patients with haemodialysis; VKAs may be preferable.

Renal function should be monitored at yearly intervals if CrCl exceeds 60 ml/min and the NOAC dose adapted in response to any change. If renal function is impaired (30-60 ml/min), six-monthly monitoring is recommended. In advanced CKD (CrCl Ôëñ30 ml/min), monitoring should be carried out every three months. These are expert suggestions that are not supported by good data.

What To Do If There is a Suspected Overdose Without Bleeding, or a Clotting Test is Indicating a Risk of Bleeding
Doses of NOACs above those recommended are associated with increased bleeding risk. In cases of acute recent ingestion of overdose, activated charcoal should be given to reduce absorption. Coagulation tests can assess possible bleeding risks. However, given the short plasma half-life of NOACs, in the absence of bleeding, a 'wait-and-see' approach is recommended.

Management of Bleeding Complications
Recommendations on bleeding management are summarised in Figure 1.

Not Life-threatening Bleeding
In view of the short plasma half-life of NOACs, time is the most important antidote.21 Restoration of haemostasis should occur within 12-24 hours after the last dose. It is therefore important to establish the exact time of last intake and factors influencing plasma concentration, such as co-medications and CKD. Dialysis is an option for removal of dabigatran,22 but the risks of bleeding at the puncture site must be balanced against the risk of waiting.

Life-threatening Bleeding
In addition to the measures for not life-threatening bleeding, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) may be used.23

Patients Undergoing a Planned Surgical Intervention or Ablation
Surgical interventions that carry a bleeding risk24 require temporary cessation of NOACs. When the intervention involves no significant bleeding risk (e.g. dental interventions, cataract, glaucoma intervention), the procedure can be carried out at the trough concentration of the NOAC (i.e. 12 or 24 hours after the last intake). If possible, the intervention should be scheduled 18-24 hours after the last intake, then NOACs restarted six hours later. For procedures with a minor bleeding risk, NOACs should be discontinued 24 hours before the procedure. For high-risk interventions such as pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or thoracic surgery, the last NOAC should be taken 48 hours previously. In cases of impaired kidney function, earlier interruption of therapy may be indicated.

For procedures with immediate and complete haemostasis, NOACs can be resumed 6-8 hours after the intervention. However, for many surgical interventions, the risks of resuming NOACs within 48-72 hours after the procedure may outweigh the risk of cardioembolism. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) may be used 6-8 hours after surgery if haemostasis has been achieved, restarting NOACs 48-72 hours after the procedure. Maximal anticoagulation effect will be achieved within two hours of ingestion. For AF patients undergoing PVI, a strategy of bridging with VKAs is preferred.25

Patients Undergoing an Urgent SurgicalIntervention
In cases of emergency intervention, the NOAC should be discontinued, surgery deferred, if possible, for at least 12 hours and ideally 24 hours after the last dose.

Patient with Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease
The combination of AF and coronary artery disease (CAD) is relatively common, and is associated with significantly higher mortality rates.26 Recommendations are based on three clinical scenarios.

Scenario 1 - Acute Coronary Syndrome Management in Atrial Fibrillation Patients on New Oral Anticoagulants
Risk scores for ischaemic and bleeding events may guide therapeutic decisions.27 NOACs should be discontinued upon presentation with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Unless contraindicated, low-dose aspirin should be given, as well as a P2Y12 inhibitor. In casesof ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), additional parenteral anticoagulation should be used. In cases of non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI), after discontinuing the NOAC and waning of its effect, fondaparinux (preferred), unfractionated heparin (UFH) or enoxaparin may be initiated. For percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in NSTEMI, the NOAC should be discontinued and the NOAC effect should have disappeared before the intervention. Periprocedural anticoagulation is recommended.

In the chronic setting (<1 year after ACS), anticoagulant therapy should be personalised, based on atherothrombotic, cardioembolic and bleeding risks. For therapy beyond the first year, treatment as in scenario 3 may be used.

Scenario 2 - Management of the Patient with a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome (<1 Year) Who Develops New Onset Atrial Fibrillation
According to ACS guidelines, dual antiplatelet therapy should be given for up to one year. If AF develops, anticoagulants may be considered. In patients with low atherothrombotic risk, VKAs monotherapy may be considered after 1-3 months, especially if they have elevated bleeding risk.

Scenario 3 - A Stable Coronary Artery Disease Patient (Acute Coronary Syndrome >1 Year Ago) Develops Atrial Fibrillation
Stable CAD patients developing AF should receive anticoagulation. Any of the NOACs may be used in preference to VKAs, without increased risk of myocardial ischaemic events.28

Cardioversion in a New Oral Anticoagulant Treated Patient
In patients with AF >48 hours duration undergoing cardioversion, oral anticoagulants should be given for at least three weeks previously, and for four weeks afterwards. Clinical data show no significant additional risk in patients treated with NOACs and VKAs.29 If NOAC compliance is assured, cardioversion should be safe. If in doubt about compliance, a prior transoesophageal echocardiogram (TOE) should be considered.

Patients Presenting with Acute Stroke While on New Oral Anticoagulants
Acute Phase
Patients with Acute Haemorrhagic Stroke
NOAC therapy should be discontinued. The use of procoagulants, as described above, may be considered.

Patients with Acute Ischaemic Stroke
Thrombolytic therapy cannot be given within 48 hours after the last dose of NOACs. In case of uncertainty regarding the last dose, a prolonged aPTT (dabigatran) or PT (FXa inhibitors) contraindicates the use of thrombolytics. If NOACs have been given within 48 hours and coagulation tests are not available or abnormal, recanalisation of the occluded vessels may be considered.

Post-acute Phase
Haemorrhagic Stroke
If the cardioembolic risk is high and risk of new haemorrhage low, NOACs may be restarted after 10-14 days. For patients with low cardioembolic risk and high bleeding risk, reinitiation of NOACs is contraindicated unless bleeding has been reversed.

Ischaemic Stroke
If the infarct size is not expected to increase the risk of secondary intracerebral bleeding, NOACs may be reinitiated in patients with transient ischaemic attack (TIA) after one day, in small, non-disabling infarcts after three days, moderate stroke after six days and large infarcts not before two weeks.

Transient Ischaemic Attack of Cardioembolic Origin
NOACs should be restarted as soon as possible; bridging with LMWH is not required.

Ischaemic Stroke of Cardioembolic Origin
Initiation of NAOCs depends on the infarct size and risk of new embolic stroke; bridging with LMWH is not required.

Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Significant Carotid Stenosis
Carotid endarterectomy and not stenting is recommended to avoid triple therapy, which is associated with increased bleeding.

New Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with a Malignancy
Patients with malignancies are at increased risk for thromboembolic events - tumours may secrete prothrombotic factors or induce inflammatory responses. Cancer therapy also inflicts bleeding risks through surgery, tissue damage or myelosuppression. Many malignancies are associated with increased risk of mucosal bleeding. Furthermore, chemotherapy may interact with coagulation mechanisms.

Multidisciplinary care by cardiologists and oncologists is required. If anticoagulant therapy is needed, the greater clinical experience of, and reversal options with VKAs indicate that they should be chosen over NOACs. Established NOAC therapy should be continued where possible. Patients undergoing radiation therapy or chemotherapy without a marked myelosuppressive effect should continue NOACs, adapting the dose if indicated. In patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy or radiation therapy, temporary dose reduction or cessation of NOACs should be considered, with monitoring of blood counts, bleeding signs, and liver and renal function.

References
  1. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1139-51.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  2. Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C, et al. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011;364:806-17.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  3. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011;365:883-91.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  4. Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Antman EM, et al. Evaluation of the novel factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: design and rationale for the Effective aNticoaGulation with factor xA next GEneration in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48). Am Heart J 2010;160:635-41.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  5. Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, et al. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association, Eur Heart J 2012;33:2719-47.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  6. Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace 2013;15:625-51.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  7. Hendriks JM, de Wit R, Crijns HJ, et al. Nurse-led care vs. usual care for patients with atrial fibrillation: results of a randomized trial of integrated chronic care vs. routine clinical care in ambulatory patients with atrial fibrillation, Eur Heart J 2012;33:2692-9.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  8. van Ryn J, Baruch L, Clemens A. Interpretation of point-of-care INR results in patients treated with dabigatran, Am J Med 2012;125:417-20.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  9. Huisman MV, Lip GY, Diener HC, et al. Dabigatran etexilate for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: resolving uncertainties in routine practice. Thromb Haemost 2012;107:838-47.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  10. Mueck W, Lensing AW, Agnelli G, et al. Rivaroxaban: population pharmacokinetic analyses in patients treated for acute deepvein thrombosis and exposure simulations in patients with atrial fibrillation treated for stroke prevention, Clin Pharmacokinet 2011;50:675-86.
    Crossref
  11. Gnoth MJ, Buetehorn U, Muenster U, et al. In vitro and in vivo P-glycoprotein transport characteristics of rivaroxaban, J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2011;338:372-80.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  12. Mueck W, Kubitza D, Becka M, Co-administration of rivaroxaban with drugs that share its elimination pathways: pharmacokinetic effects in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2013;76:455-66.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  13. Wang L, Zhang D, Raghavan N, et al. In vitro assessment of metabolic drug-drug interaction potential of apixaban through cytochrome P450 phenotyping, inhibition, and induction studies. Drug Metab Dispos 2010;38:448-58.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  14. European Heart Rhythm Association; European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Europace 2010;12:1360-420.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  15. LaHaye SA, Gibbens SL, Ball DG, et al. A clinical decision aid for the selection of antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of stroke due to atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2163-71.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  16. Lalibert├® F, Nelson WW, Lefebvre P, et al. Impact of daily dosing frequency on adherence to chronic medications among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Adv Ther 2012;29:675-90.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  17. Olesen JB, Lip GY, Kamper AL, et al. Stroke and bleeding in atrial fibrillation with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2012;367:625-35.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  18. Hohnloser SH, Hijazi Z, Thomas L, et al. Efficacy of apixaban when compared with warfarin in relation to renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the ARISTOTLE trial. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2821-30.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  19. Piccini JP, Stevens SR, Chang Y, et al. Response to letter regarding article, ÔÇ£renal dysfunction as a predictor of stroke and systemic embolism in patients With nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: validation of the R2CHADS2 index in the ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once-Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) and ATRIA (Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation) Study CohortsÔÇØ. Circulation 2013;128:e172-3.
  20. Fox KA, Piccini JP, Wojdyla D, et al. Prevention of stroke and systemic embolism with rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and moderate renal impairment. Eur Heart J 2011;32:2387-94.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  21. Levi M, Eerenberg E, Kamphuisen PW. Bleeding risk and reversal strategies for old and new anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. J Thromb Haemost 2011;9:1705-12.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  22. Stangier J, Rathgen K, Stähle H, Mazur D. Influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral dabigatran etexilate: an open-label, parallel-group, singlecentre study. Clin Pharmacokinet 2010;49:259-68.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  23. van Ryn J, Ruehl D, Priepke H, et al. Reversibility of the anticoagulant effect of high doses of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, by recombinant factor VIIa or activated prothrombin complex concentrate. Haematologica 2008;93 (Suppl 1):148.
  24. Torn M, Rosendaal FR. Oral anticoagulation in surgical procedures: risks and recommendations. Br J Haematol 2003;123:676-82.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  25. Lakkireddy D, Reddy YM, Di Biase L, et al. Feasibility and safety of dabigatran versus warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter prospective registry, J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1168-74.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  26. Lopes RD, Pieper KS, Horton JR, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes following atrial fibrillation in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. Heart 2008;94:867-73.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  27. Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011;32:2999-3054.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  28. Hohnloser SH, Oldgren J, Yang S, et al. Myocardial ischemic events in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with dabigatran or warfarin in the RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial. Circulation 2012;125:669-76.
    Crossref | Pubmed
  29. Nagarakanti R, Ezekowitz MD, Oldgren J, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of patients undergoing cardioversion. Circulation 2011;123:131-6.
    Crossref | Pubmed