Review Article

Atrial Fibrosis, Ischaemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation

Register or Login to View PDF Permissions
Permissions× For commercial reprint enquiries please contact Springer Healthcare: ReprintsWarehouse@springernature.com.

For permissions and non-commercial reprint enquiries, please visit Copyright.com to start a request.

For author reprints, please email rob.barclay@radcliffe-group.com.
Information image
Average (ratings)
No ratings
Your rating

Abstract

Atrial fibrosis is an important component of the arrhythmic substrate in AF. Evidence suggests that atrial fibrosis also plays a role in increasing the risk of stroke in patients with the arrhythmia. Patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), who are suspected to have AF but are rarely shown to have it, frequently demonstrate evidence of atrial fibrosis; measured using late-gadolinium enhancement MRI, this manifests as atrial remodelling encompassing structural, functional and electrical properties. In this review, the authors discuss the available evidence linking atrial disease, including fibrosis, with the risk of ischaemic stroke in AF, as well as in the ESUS population, in whom it has been linked to recurrent stroke and new-onset AF. They also discuss the implications of this association on future research that may elucidate the mechanism of stroke and stroke prevention strategies in the AF and ESUS populations.

Disclosure:The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Received:

Accepted:

Published online:

Correspondence Details:Nazem Akoum, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195, US. E: nakoum@cardiology.washington.edu

Open Access:

This work is open access under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License which allows users to copy, redistribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is cited correctly.

Ischaemic stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity globally. The association between AF and stroke has long been established. Each year, AF-related cardio-embolic stroke accounts for up to one-quarter of ischaemic strokes in the US.1

The mechanisms behind cardio-embolic stroke in AF are not completely understood and are thought to involve blood stasis, hypercoagulability and tissue injury, similar to what is seen in other thrombotic phenomena in vascular beds, as previously described by Virchow.2

Atrial fibrosis plays a central role in creating a substrate for AF.3 Fibrosis results from myocyte loss and replacement with collagen in the extracellular space. This leads to increased heterogeneity in the atrial tissue which, coupled with atrial myocyte electrical remodelling, alters the anisotropy and conduction velocity of electrical wave propagation within the atrial myocardium, resulting in an increased probability of arrhythmia initiation and sustenance, in line with the concept of atrial myopathy presented by Goette et al.4,5

The relationship between atrial fibrosis and stroke is garnering more attention in view of supporting evidence from the AF patient population. New research in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) also suggests a relationship between atrial fibrosis and stroke independent of the presence of AF.

In this review, we discuss the available evidence linking atrial fibrosis to stroke in patients with and without known AF, as well as new evidence linking atrial fibrosis with new-onset AF and recurrent stroke in patients with ESUS. The evidence presented forms the foundation of a new paradigm in the relationship between atrial arrhythmia and stroke, where fibrosis is central to this relationship and is at the nexus between these two clinically important problems.

AF and Embolic Stroke: is AF necessary?

The classical mechanistic relationship between AF and stroke stipulates that AF, in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, leads to stasis and hypercoagulability with subsequent thrombus formation and systemic embolisation. Patients with persistent and permanent patterns of AF, typically associated with a higher burden of arrhythmia, have a higher risk of stroke than patients with paroxysmal forms.6 A higher burden of AF has also been associated with a higher stroke risk in patients with paroxysmal AF.6

Suppression of AF with catheter ablation has been associated with a reduction in stroke risk in observational studies, and in a recent randomised trial of persistent and long-standing AF.7,8 Early rhythm control of patients within a year of diagnosis with AF has also been associated with stroke reduction.9

These findings support a causal association between AF and stroke. This is in contrast to other studies of patients with ICDs, such as pacemakers and implantable defibrillators, which have argued against causality because of the observed temporal dissociation of AF episodes with thrombo-embolic events.10

Pacemakers and ICDs with atrial leads allowing for continuous atrial arrhythmia monitoring provide a high-fidelity rhythm recording of atrial arrhythmias including AF, and are a unique source of information for studying the temporal relationship between atrial arrhythmias and thromboembolic events, including stroke.

Several studies examining this temporal association have shown that there were no device-detected atrial arrhythmia episodes preceding thrombo-embolic events in a large majority of patients.11,12 In another study, oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists was started and discontinued as device-detected episodes of arrhythmia failed to show benefits of this approach and also demonstrated a temporal dissociation between AF episodes and thromboembolic events.13 These findings suggest that, in this population of patients with ICDs, the presence of AF is not an essential component of the mechanism of thromboembolic events.

Against this background, an alternative explanation has been proposed. This is based on the presence of underlying atrial disease manifesting with symptomatic bradycardia, hence requiring a ICD and, simultaneously, predisposing these patients to thrombo-emboli independent from atrial arrhythmic events.

Another stroke population where the association between atrial disease and stroke has been examined is ESUS, which is a subset of cryptogenic stroke. AF has long been suspected in these patients as a potential cause of cardiac thrombo-emboli. Long-term cardiac monitoring in patients with cryptogenic stroke has revealed that longer monitoring is associated with higher detection rates of AF.14 However, even using a relatively short duration of episodes (30 seconds), the rate of incident AF was about 30% after three years of monitoring using an implantable loop recorder in the CRYSTAL AF study.15 Another way of stating these findings is that 70% of these cryptogenic stroke patients did not have detectable arrhythmia.15

These findings also call into question the role of AF in thrombo-embolic stroke in this population. In the LOOP study, anticoagulation based on detected arrhythmias using implantable loop recorders in patients with stroke risk factors did not demonstrate a beneficial decrease in stroke rates, leading the investigators to conclude that not all AF is worth screening and anticoagulating for.16

Moreover, the role of clinical risk factors in modulating stroke risk in AF and ESUS populations is not clearly understood; research has demonstrated that the CHA2DS2-VASc aggregate score is more predictive of thrombo-embolic events in the absence than the presence of AF.17

An alternative mechanism has been gaining support with new evidence from various studies. In this new model, atrial fibrosis and associated atrial disease is the nexus between arrhythmia and thrombo-embolic phenomena. This new paradigm is supported by evidence of biomarker activation, atrial enlargement, contractile dysfunction and increased atrial fibrosis in patients with stroke, including ESUS, as well as AF.18,19 We discuss the available evidence in the paragraphs below.

Biomarkers of Fibrosis and Association with Stroke

Many biomarkers involved in the coagulation cascade and subsequent thrombolysis, including thrombin, fibrin and D-dimer, have been associated with cardioembolic stroke.20,21 Other biomarkers of cardiac dysfunction – including abnormal extracellular matrix homeostasis, which is linked to abnormal collagen turnover and subsequent fibrosis – have also been proposed.

Marìn et al. have demonstrated abnormal ratios of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in patients with AF, but a direct link to stroke is lacking.22 Similarly, pro-collagen type III N-terminal pro-peptide (PIIINP), C-telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) and galactin-3 (gal-3) have been studied as biomarkers of fibrosis in patients with AF and linked to arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation, but have not been studied in stroke in the setting of AF or other ischaemic strokes.23–25

Cardiac troponin and N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) have been linked to cardioembolic stroke, and ESUS in large cohort studies, including the MESA and the ARIC studies.26–29 BNP is a neurohormone that is primarily released from the ventricles in response to increased wall tension and stretch. It has diuretic (natriuretic) properties and attenuates the reninangiotensinaldosterone response, resulting in smooth muscle relaxation in blood vessels. It is synthesised as a pro-hormone (pro-BNP) and is later cleaved into a C-terminal and an N-terminal (NT)-proBNP fragments. Identifying elevated levels of NT-pro-BNP can be useful in the setting of ischaemic stroke, especially cryptogenic stroke, where they may indicate the presence of heart failure and AF, both important risk factors for cardiac embolism.30 It is important to note that, while these biomarkers suggest myocyte loss and subsequent atrial fibrosis, a direct link to thrombus formation is still lacking.

ECG Evidence of Fibrosis and Relationship with Stroke

The 12-lead ECG is a widely available tool that is commonly used in the setting of stroke to evaluate patients for the presence of AF. In patients in sinus rhythm, the ECG can be used to evaluate for evidence of left atrial remodelling. Of multiple P wave indices, the terminal portion in lead V1 has been studied in patients with ischaemic stroke and shown to correlate with this outcome.31

The P wave terminal force in V1 (PTFV1) is the product of P wave width and depth and can be calculated either manually or automatically on commercially available ECG signal processing software. Abnormal PTFV1 has been shown to be associated with incident ischaemic stroke in a number of studies.32 While PTFV1 appears to be a useful ECG marker for LA remodelling, its specific relationship with atrial fibrosis has not been studied. Moreover, the temporal stability of this index is not well studied.

Echocardiographic Assessment of Atrial Size and Function

Basic echocardiographic assessment of atrial structure includes atrial diameters and surface area in various views. Larger anteriorposterior atrial diameter in the parasternal long axis view and the left atrial area in the four-chamber view have been associated with stroke risk with or without AF.33,34 Similarly, larger atrial volume indexed to the body surface area has also been associated with ischaemic stroke.

More advanced echocardiographic measures, such as speckle tracking, can detect more subtle abnormalities in atrial function. Atrial reservoir dysfunction, a sign of reduced LA compliance, assessed using this approach has been associated with cryptogenic stroke.35 These atrial mechanical and contractile abnormalities measured using atrial strain and strain rate on echocardiography have also been associated with atrial fibrosis quantified using cardiac MRI.36

Cardiac MRI Assessment of Atrial Shape and Contractile Function

Feature tracking using cardiac MRI has been used to examine atrial relaxation and contraction. Atrial reservoir function and atrial emptying fraction were found to be associated with ischaemic stroke in the absence of prevalent or incident AF.37

Atrial Fibrosis With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source

Article image

Moreover, atrial shape deformation with increased atrial sphericity leading to abnormal blood-flow patterns in the left atrium and left atrial appendage have been proposed to have a role in thrombogenesis.38 These findings further support the concept of atrial disease or atrial myopathy as a contributor along the causative pathway of ischaemic stroke independent of AF.39

Cardiac MRI Fibrosis Quantification

MRI for the assessment of cardiac fibrosis is commonly used in the work-up and assessment of various types of cardiomyopathies. Late-gadolinium enhancement MRI (LGE-MRI) is an established technique that leverages the washout kinetics of gadolinium, an extracellular contrast agent. The correlation of LGE-MRI-identified fibrosis with ventricular myocardial pathology has been established.40

Applying this imaging technique to the left atrium is more difficult owing to the thin atrial wall and the special resolution of this imaging modality. Our previous research has correlated LGE-MRI fibrosis of the left atrium with an abundance of collagen on atrial biopsies and demonstrated a strong correlation with catheter ablation outcomes in AF.41,42

Fibrosis detected by LGE-MRI has been demonstrated to be significantly higher in patients with a prior history of stroke, as well as with new-onset major adverse cardiovascular events including ischaemic stroke.43,44 Atrial fibrosis was also found to be elevated in patients with left atrial appendage thrombi found on transoesophageal echocardiographic evaluation.45

In patients without known AF, atrial fibrosis has been demonstrated to be more pronounced in ESUS patients than in age- and sex-matched controls to a degree similar to that seen in AF, suggesting that atrial fibrosis may be in the causative pathway linking AF and stroke.46 In a larger study, atrial fibrosis was found to be significantly higher in patients with ESUS than in lacunar stroke patients and control subjects and comparable to that seen in patients with known AF (Figure 1).47

In a prospective study, patients with ESUS underwent LGE-MRI quantification of left atrial fibrosis and were followed prospectively for recurrent stroke or incident AF.47 Those with atrial fibrosis ≥12% were found to have a 4.3-fold increase in the risk of the combined outcome of recurrent stroke or new-onset AF compared to those with fibrosis <12%, after an average follow-up period of 19 months (Figure 2). The potential implications of this study may be significant in patients with ESUS, as atrial fibrosis could be a patient selection tool for oral anticoagulation for secondary prevention. In addition, atrial fibrosis may be a therapeutic target to reduce the risk of stroke and new-onset AF.

Outcome by Degree of Fibrosis

Article image

The NAVIGATE-ESUS and RESPECT-ESUS clinical trials randomized patients with ESUS to aspirin or oral anticoagulation therapy with rivaroxaban and dabigatran, respectively.48,49 Both studies showed no significant benefit in oral anticoagulation when using no atrial disease-specific selection strategy. In a post-hoc analysis of the NAVIGATE-ESUS trial, patients with an increased atrial surface area were found to benefit from OAC, indicating that people with atrial disease may benefit from such therapy.50

Selecting patients based on suspected atrial disease for anticoagulation is being studied in the ARCADIA clinical trial, where patients with evidence of left atrial enlargement on echocardiography, PTFV1 or elevated plasma NT-pro-BNP will be randomised to receive either aspirin or oral anticoagulation with apixaban.51 Other trials using elevated LGE-MRI detected atrial fibrosis for selection for oral anticoagulation are also in preparation and will be launched soon.

Conclusion

Atrial fibrosis is a multifactorial phenomenon with measurable abnormalities in biomarkers and cardiac imaging. While current evidence suggests there are links between atrial fibrosis and both atrial arrhythmia and thromboembolic disease, the mechanism by which fibrosis leads to thrombus formation and predisposition to embolisation including stroke is still not completely understood. It is also plausible, since fibrosis is associated with many cardiovascular risk factors, that it may be a marker of overall cardiovascular risk including stroke.

In the presence of AF, fibrosis may play an important role in creating a state of electromechanical dysfunction that leads to stasis and localised contractile dysfunction that may form a nidus for thrombus formation.52 Fibrosis may also be implicated in the pathogenesis of a hypercoagulable state.21 In the absence of AF, electromechanical dysfunction and altered blood flow dynamics may also be at play. Research to understand these mechanisms is under way using computational modelling of arrhythmia and blood-flow dynamics in tissue fibrosis obtained through cardiac imaging.51

Clinical Perspective

  • Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) is a clinical challenge for neurologists and cardiologists as the rate of AF detection is low and the risk of recurrent stroke is high.
  • Evidence suggests a link between atrial fibrosis and ESUS independent of AF, which suggests that fibrosis is on the causal pathway for thrombo-embolisation.
  • Atrial fibrosis-based strategies for risk stratification and secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke are needed.

References

  1. Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2020;141:e139–596.
    Crossref | PubMed
  2. Watson T, Shantsila E, Lip GY. Mechanisms of thrombogenesis in atrial fibrillation: Virchow’s triad revisited. Lancet 2009;373:155–66.
    Crossref | PubMed
  3. Nattel S, Heijman J, Zhou L, et al. Molecular basis of atrial fibrillation pathophysiology and therapy: a translational perspective. Circ Res 2020;127:51–72.
    Crossref | PubMed
  4. Honarbakhsh S, Schilling RJ, Orini M, et al. Structural remodeling and conduction velocity dynamics in the human left atrium: relationship with reentrant mechanisms sustaining atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2019;16:18–25.
    Crossref | PubMed
  5. Goette A, Kalman JM, Aguinaga L, et al. EHRA/HRS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus on atrial cardiomyopathies: definition, characterization, and clinical implication. Europace 2016;18:1455–90.
    Crossref | PubMed
  6. Steinberg BA, Hellkamp AS, Lokhnygina Y, et al. Higher risk of death and stroke in patients with persistent vs paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the ROCKET-AF Trial. Eur Heart J 2015;36:288–96.
    Crossref | PubMed
  7. Bunch TJ, May HT, Bair TL, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation patients have long-term stroke rates similar to patients without atrial fibrillation regardless of CHADS2 score. Heart Rhythm 2013;10:1272–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  8. Wu G, Huang H, Cai L, et al. Long-term observation of catheter ablation vs pharmacotherapy in the management of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (CAPA study). Europace 2020;23:731–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  9. Kirchhof P, Camm AJ, Goette A, et al. Early rhythm-control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1305–16.
    Crossref | PubMed
  10. Hirsh BJ, Copeland-Halperin RS, Halperin JL. Fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, and thromboembolism: mechanistic links and clinical inferences. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:2239–51.
    Crossref | PubMed
  11. Brambatti M, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, et al. Temporal relationship between subclinical atrial fibrillation and embolic events. Circulation 2014;129:2094–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  12. Daoud EG, Glotzer TV, Wyse DG, et al. Temporal relationship of atrial tachyarrhythmias, cerebrovascular events, and systemic emboli based on stored device data: a subgroup analysis of TRENDS. Heart Rhythm 2011;8:1416–23.
    Crossref | PubMed
  13. Martin DT, Bersohn MM, Waldo AL, et al. Randomized trial of atrial arrhythmia monitoring to guide anticoagulation in patients with implanted defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization devices. Eur Heart J 2015;36:1660–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  14. Gladstone DJ, Spring M, Dorian P, et al. Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2467–77.
    Crossref | PubMed
  15. Sanna T, Diener HC, Passman RS, et al. Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2478–86.
    Crossref | PubMed
  16. Svendsen JH, Diederichsen SZ, Hojberg S, et al. Implantable loop recorder detection of atrial fibrillation to prevent stroke (the LOOP study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2021;398:1507–16.
    Crossref | PubMed
  17. Mitchell LB, Southern DA, Galbraith D, et al. Prediction of stroke or TIA in patients without atrial fibrillation using CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Heart 2014;100:1524–30.
    Crossref | PubMed
  18. Kamel H, Okin PM, Elkind MS, et al. Atrial fibrillation and mechanisms of stroke: time for a new model. Stroke 2016;47:895–900.
    Crossref | PubMed
  19. Akoum N. New perspectives on atrial fibrillation and stroke. Heart 2016;102:1788–92.
    Crossref | PubMed
  20. Turgut N, Akdemir O, Turgut B, et al. Hypercoagulopathy in stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: hematologic and cardiologic investigations. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2006;12:15–20.
    Crossref | PubMed
  21. Ding WY, Gupta D, Lip GYH. Atrial fibrillation and the prothrombotic state: revisiting Virchow’s triad in 2020. Heart 2020;106:1463–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  22. Marín F, Roldán V, Climent V, et al. Is thrombogenesis in atrial fibrillation related to matrix metalloproteinase-1 and its inhibitor, TIMP-1? Stroke 2003;34:1181–6.
    Crossref | PubMed
  23. Begg GA, Karim R, Oesterlein T, et al. Intra-cardiac and peripheral levels of biochemical markers of fibrosis in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace 2017;19:1944–50.
    Crossref | PubMed
  24. Begg GA, Karim R, Oesterlein T, et al. Left atrial voltage, circulating biomarkers of fibrosis, and atrial fibrillation ablation. A prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2018;13:e0189936.
    Crossref | PubMed
  25. Begg GA, Swoboda PP, Karim R, et al. Imaging, biomarker and invasive assessment of diffuse left ventricular myocardial fibrosis in atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2020;22:13.
    Crossref | PubMed
  26. Cushman M, Judd SE, Howard VJ, et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and stroke risk: the reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke cohort. Stroke 2014;45:1646–50.
    Crossref | PubMed
  27. Hijazi Z, Oldgren J, Andersson U, et al. Cardiac biomarkers are associated with an increased risk of stroke and death in patients with atrial fibrillation: a Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) substudy. Circulation 2012;125:1605–16.
    Crossref | PubMed
  28. Folsom AR, Nambi V, Bell EJ, et al. Troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and incidence of stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Stroke 2013;44:961–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  29. Llombart V, Antolin-Fontes A, Bustamante A, et al. B-type natriuretic peptides help in cardioembolic stroke diagnosis: pooled data meta-analysis. Stroke 2015;46:1187–95.
    Crossref | PubMed
  30. Fonseca AC, Brito D, Pinho e Melo T, et al. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide shows diagnostic accuracy for detecting atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke patients. Int J Stroke 2014;9:419–25.
    Crossref | PubMed
  31. Kwon Y, McHugh S, Ghoreshi K, et al. Electrocardiographic left atrial abnormality in patients presenting with ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2020;29:105086.
    Crossref | PubMed
  32. He J, Tse G, Korantzopoulos P, et al. P-wave indices and risk of ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2017;48:2066–72.
    Crossref | PubMed
  33. Di Tullio MR, Sacco RL, Sciacca RR, et al. Left atrial size and the risk of ischemic stroke in an ethnically mixed population. Stroke 1999;30:2019–24.
    Crossref | PubMed
  34. Benjamin EJ, D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, et al. Left atrial size and the risk of stroke and death. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1995;92:835–41.
    Crossref | PubMed
  35. Leong DP, Joyce E, Debonnaire P, et al. Left atrial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of cryptogenic stroke: novel insights from speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2017;30:71–9.e1.
    Crossref | PubMed
  36. Kuppahally SS, Akoum N, Burgon NS, et al. Left atrial strain and strain rate in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: relationship to left atrial structural remodeling detected by delayed-enhancement MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:231–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  37. Habibi M, Zareian M, Ambale Venkatesh B, et al. Left atrial mechanical function and incident ischemic cerebrovascular events independent of AF: insights from the MESA study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:2417–27.
    Crossref | PubMed
  38. Markl M, Lee DC, Furiasse N, et al. Left atrial and left atrial appendage 4D blood flow dynamics in atrial fibrillation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9:e004984.
    Crossref | PubMed
  39. Bisbal F, Baranchuk A, Braunwald E, et al. Atrial failure as a clinical entity: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:222–32.
    Crossref | PubMed
  40. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999;100:1992–2002.
    Crossref | PubMed
  41. Marrouche NF, Wilber D, Hindricks G, et al. Association of atrial tissue fibrosis identified by delayed enhancement MRI and atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the DECAAF study. JAMA 2014;311:498–506.
    Crossref | PubMed
  42. McGann C, Akoum N, Patel A, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation outcome is predicted by left atrial remodeling on MRI. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014;7:23–30.
    Crossref | PubMed
  43. Daccarett M, Badger TJ, Akoum N, et al. Association of left atrial fibrosis detected by delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging and the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:831–8.
    Crossref | PubMed
  44. King JB, Azadani PN, Suksaranjit P, et al. Left atrial fibrosis and risk of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:1311–21.
    Crossref | PubMed
  45. Akoum N, Fernandez G, Wilson B, et al. Association of atrial fibrosis quantified using LGE-MRI with atrial appendage thrombus and spontaneous contrast on transesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2013;24:1104–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  46. Tandon K, Tirschwell D, Longstreth WT Jr, et al. Embolic stroke of undetermined source correlates to atrial fibrosis without atrial fibrillation. Neurology 2019;93:e381–7.
    Crossref | PubMed
  47. Kühnlein P, Mahnkopf C, Majersik JJ, et al. Atrial fibrosis in embolic stroke of undetermined source: a multicenter study. Eur J Neurol 2021;28:3634–9.
    Crossref | PubMed
  48. Diener HC, Sacco RL, Easton JD, et al. Dabigatran for prevention of stroke after embolic stroke of undetermined source. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1906–17.
    Crossref | PubMed
  49. Hart RG, Sharma M, Mundl H, et al. Rivaroxaban for stroke prevention after embolic stroke of undetermined source. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2191–201.
    Crossref | PubMed
  50. Healey JS, Gladstone DJ, Swaminathan B, et al. Recurrent stroke with rivaroxaban compared with aspirin according to predictors of atrial fibrillation: secondary analysis of the NAVIGATE ESUS randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:764–73.
    Crossref | PubMed
  51. Kamel H, Longstreth WT, Jr., Tirschwell DL, et al. The AtRial Cardiopathy and Antithrombotic Drugs In prevention After cryptogenic stroke randomized trial: rationale and methods. Int J Stroke 2019;14:207–14.
    Crossref | PubMed
  52. Boyle PM, Del Alamo JC, Akoum N. Fibrosis, atrial fibrillation and stroke: clinical updates and emerging mechanistic models. Heart 2020;107:99–105.
    Crossref | PubMed